Database error: Invalid SQL: select * from pwn_comment where pid='36903' and iffb='1' order by id limit 0,10
MySQL Error: 1194 (Table 'pwn_comment' is marked as crashed and should be repaired)
#0 dbbase_sql->halt(Invalid SQL: select * from pwn_comment where pid='36903' and iffb='1' order by id limit 0,10) called at [D:\WWW\simulunte\includes\db.inc.php:73] #1 dbbase_sql->query(select * from {P}_comment where pid='36903' and iffb='1' order by id limit 0,10) called at [D:\WWW\simulunte\comment\module\CommentContent.php:167] #2 CommentContent() called at [D:\WWW\simulunte\includes\common.inc.php:536] #3 PrintPage() called at [D:\WWW\simulunte\comment\html\index.php:13] 网友留言-Ordance rates of MS in 1st degree relatives of MS probands私慕纶特【官方网站】
导航菜单
module file (../../menu/module/DropMenu49.php) not exist
当前日期时间
当前时间:
联系我们
汉中华体美煜体育设施限公司【官方网站】
地址:汉中市南郑县大河坎经济开发区
电话:17392350356
 
 
点评详情
发布于:2018-12-7 03:31:25  访问:60 次 回复:0 篇
版主管理 | 推荐 | 删除 | 删除并扣分
Ordance rates of MS in 1st degree relatives of MS probands
Ordance rates of MS in first GSK2141795 degree relatives of MS probands assuming (Pt0 = Pt1), 20 Dominant genes and 80 Recessive genesNumber of Susceptibility Genes Needed (n) 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.5 r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r = 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.5 r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r =(Targets are in bold)17 13.4 ten.five 6.five?.five 4.six?.5 three.eight?.3 3.1?.7 2.7?.three 2.4?.9 13.four 10.four five.eight?.eight three.3?.0 two.0?.four 1.two?.6 0.eight?.1 0.6?.818 13.three?3.four ten.two?1.four 6.9?.9 4.4?.2 3.6?.3 2.9?.six 2.six?.1 2.3?.8 13.3?three.4 ten.0?1.three 6.2?.two 3.0?.7 1.8?.four 1.1?.five 0.7?.0 0.5?.730 13.4 9.9?1.0 5.three?.7 3.five?.7 two.5?.5 1.9?.7 1.5?.2 1.3?.9 13.four 8.8?1.2 four.four?.7 2.0?.0 0.9?.4 0.four?.7 0.two?.four 0.1?.240 13.four 10.1?1.9 five.six?.0 three.0?.two 2.0?.7 1.5?.0 1.1?.six 0.9?.three 13.4 9.three?1.three 4.six?.9 1.five?.three 0.six?.9 0.two?.four 0.1?.2 0.0?.150 13.4 9.9?2.1 5.2?.1 2.eight?.six 1.7?.three 1.two?.6 0.8?.2 0.six?.9 13.four 9.six?1.9 four.1?.9 1.two?.7 0.four?.six 0.1?.two 0.0?.1 0.060 13.four ten.6?3.1 five.five?0.5 two.4?.9 1.four?.9 0.9?.7 0.6?.9 0.five?.1 13.4 ten.three?three.0 four.two?.5 PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024392 0.9?.1 0.two?.7 0.1?.7 0.0?.three 0.0Predicted Concordance in Non-twin Siblings (Target = 2.9?.8 ) 13.4 9.three?0.9 7.1?.two four.5?.4 three.eight?.5 3.two?.9 two.8?.5 2.five?.1 13.four 9.1?0.7 six.four?.five three.two?.0 two.1?.9 1.4?.eight 0.9?.three 0.7?.9Predicted Concordance in Parents/LY2886721 chemical information Children (Target = 1.eight?.1 )Table ten (7a) Predicted concordance prices of MS in second and third degree relatives of MS probands assuming (Pt0 = Pt1), 20 Dominant genes and 80 Recessive genesNumber of Susceptibility Genes Essential (n) 5 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.five r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r = 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.5 r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r = 16 11.8 eight.three 4.four two.7?.three 1.7?.8 1.six?.five 1.four?.four 1.3?.2 12.1 9.2 5.6 3.7?.5 two.5?.9 two.four?.five 2.1?.two 1.9?.0 10 13.0 7.6 3.2?.4 two.1?.9 1.four?.0 1.1?.7 1.0?.four 0.9?.3 12.9 6.three two.0?.0 1.1?.7 0.7?.1 0.five?.9 0.5?.8 0.4?.7 11 12.9 6.eight?.1 three.five?.7 1.8?.5 1.4?.8 1.0?.5 0.9?.three 0.eight?.1 12.eight 5.five?.9 two.three?.3 0.9?.4 0.six?.9 0.5?.7 0.four?.six 0.3?.5 12 12.eight 6.1?.4 2.8?.0 1.8?.4 1.2?.7 0.9?.three 0.7?.1 0.six?.9 12.7 4.eight?.1 1.7?.four 0.9?.3 0.five?.8 0.four?.six 0.3?.5 0.3?.five 13 12.8?3.three 7.8 three.1?.1 1.five?.1 1.0?.four 0.eight?.1 0.six?.9 0.5?.eight 12.five?three.3 six.4 1.9?.7 0.7?.1 0.four?.7 0.3?.five 0.three?.four 0.two?.4 14 12.7-13.3 7.1?.1 3.4?.4 1.5?.0 0.9?.2 0.7?.0 0.5?.eight 0.5?.7 12.four?3.2 5.7?.8 two.1?.9 0.7?.0 0.4?.five 0.three?.4 0.2?.three 0.2?.3 15 12.six?three.3 6.5?.five 2.7?.7 1.three?.eight 0.8?.2 0.6?.9 0.5?.7 0.4?.six 12.3?3.2 five.0?.1 1.six?.2 0.5?.eight 0.three?.five 0.two?.3 0.two?.three 0.1?.two Predicted Concordance in Second Degree Relatives (Target = 0.9?.six )Predicted Concordance in Third Degree Relatives (Target = 0.9 )(Targets are in bold; optimal answer is underlined)Goodin BMC Neurology 2010, 10:101 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/10/Page 21 ofTable 11 (7b) Predicted concordance PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27196668 prices of MS in second and third degree relatives of MS probands assuming (Pt0 = Pt1), 20 Dominant genes and 80 Recessive genesNumber of Susceptibility Genes Expected (n) 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.5 r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r = 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.five r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r =(Targets are in bold)17 13.two 7.4 two.four - three.three 1.1 - 1.five 0.7 - 0.9 0.five - 0.7 0.4 - 0.5 0.3 - 0.5 13.1 5.8 1.three - 1.9 0.four - 0.six 0.two - 0.3 0.1 - 0.2 0.1 - 0.2 0.1 - 0.218 13.two - 13.four six.eight - eight.six two.7 - three.five 0.9 - 1.three 0.6 - 0.8 0.four -.Ordance prices of MS in initial degree relatives of MS probands assuming (Pt0 = Pt1), 20 Dominant genes and 80 Recessive genesNumber of Susceptibility Genes Necessary (n) 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.5 r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r = 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.five r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r =(Targets are in bold)17 13.four ten.five six.five?.five four.6?.five three.eight?.three three.1?.7 two.7?.3 two.4?.9 13.4 ten.four 5.eight?.eight three.3?.0 two.0?.four 1.two?.six 0.8?.1 0.6?.818 13.3?3.4 10.2?1.four 6.9?.9 four.four?.two 3.six?.3 2.9?.6 2.6?.1 two.three?.eight 13.3?3.four ten.0?1.three 6.2?.2 3.0?.7 1.eight?.four 1.1?.five 0.7?.0 0.5?.730 13.4 9.9?1.0 5.3?.7 3.five?.7 two.five?.5 1.9?.7 1.five?.two 1.three?.9 13.4 8.eight?1.2 four.four?.7 2.0?.0 0.9?.4 0.four?.7 0.2?.4 0.1?.240 13.4 10.1?1.9 5.6?.0 3.0?.two two.0?.7 1.5?.0 1.1?.six 0.9?.three 13.4 9.three?1.3 four.six?.9 1.5?.3 0.6?.9 0.two?.4 0.1?.2 0.0?.150 13.four 9.9?2.1 five.two?.1 two.eight?.six 1.7?.3 1.two?.six 0.eight?.2 0.six?.9 13.4 9.six?1.9 4.1?.9 1.two?.7 0.four?.six 0.1?.two 0.0?.1 0.060 13.4 10.6?3.1 5.5?0.5 2.four?.9 1.4?.9 0.9?.7 0.six?.9 0.5?.1 13.4 10.3?three.0 4.two?.five PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024392 0.9?.1 0.2?.7 0.1?.7 0.0?.3 0.0Predicted Concordance in Non-twin Siblings (Target = two.9?.8 ) 13.4 9.three?0.9 7.1?.two 4.5?.4 three.8?.five three.2?.9 2.8?.5 2.five?.1 13.4 9.1?0.7 6.4?.five three.2?.0 2.1?.9 1.four?.eight 0.9?.three 0.7?.9Predicted Concordance in Parents/Children (Target = 1.eight?.1 )Table 10 (7a) Predicted concordance prices of MS in second and third degree relatives of MS probands assuming (Pt0 = Pt1), 20 Dominant genes and 80 Recessive genesNumber of Susceptibility Genes Expected (n) five Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.five r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r = 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.5 r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r = 16 11.8 eight.three 4.four two.7?.3 1.7?.eight 1.six?.five 1.four?.four 1.three?.2 12.1 9.2 5.6 3.7?.5 two.five?.9 two.four?.5 2.1?.2 1.9?.0 ten 13.0 7.six three.two?.four two.1?.9 1.four?.0 1.1?.7 1.0?.four 0.9?.three 12.9 six.3 2.0?.0 1.1?.7 0.7?.1 0.five?.9 0.five?.8 0.four?.7 11 12.9 6.eight?.1 3.five?.7 1.8?.five 1.four?.eight 1.0?.five 0.9?.three 0.8?.1 12.eight five.5?.9 2.3?.three 0.9?.four 0.six?.9 0.5?.7 0.4?.six 0.three?.5 12 12.8 six.1?.four 2.8?.0 1.8?.four 1.two?.7 0.9?.three 0.7?.1 0.six?.9 12.7 four.eight?.1 1.7?.four 0.9?.three 0.5?.eight 0.four?.six 0.three?.five 0.three?.5 13 12.eight?3.3 7.eight three.1?.1 1.5?.1 1.0?.four 0.eight?.1 0.six?.9 0.5?.eight 12.five?three.three 6.4 1.9?.7 0.7?.1 0.4?.7 0.3?.5 0.3?.4 0.two?.4 14 12.7-13.three 7.1?.1 three.four?.4 1.five?.0 0.9?.2 0.7?.0 0.5?.8 0.5?.7 12.4?three.two five.7?.8 2.1?.9 0.7?.0 0.four?.five 0.three?.4 0.2?.3 0.2?.three 15 12.six?three.3 6.5?.5 2.7?.7 1.three?.eight 0.eight?.2 0.six?.9 0.five?.7 0.four?.6 12.3?three.2 five.0?.1 1.six?.2 0.5?.eight 0.3?.5 0.2?.3 0.2?.3 0.1?.2 Predicted Concordance in Second Degree Relatives (Target = 0.9?.six )Predicted Concordance in Third Degree Relatives (Target = 0.9 )(Targets are in bold; optimal resolution is underlined)Goodin BMC Neurology 2010, 10:101 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/10/Page 21 ofTable 11 (7b) Predicted concordance PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27196668 prices of MS in second and third degree relatives of MS probands assuming (Pt0 = Pt1), 20 Dominant genes and 80 Recessive genesNumber of Susceptibility Genes Expected (n) 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.5 r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r = 16 Frequency of Susceptibility (r) r = 0.25 r = 0.33 r = 0.five r=1 r=2 r=4 r=8 r =(Targets are in bold)17 13.2 7.four two.4 - 3.3 1.1 - 1.five 0.7 - 0.9 0.5 - 0.7 0.4 - 0.five 0.3 - 0.five 13.1 five.eight 1.three - 1.9 0.four - 0.6 0.two - 0.three 0.1 - 0.two 0.1 - 0.2 0.1 - 0.218 13.two - 13.4 six.8 - eight.six two.7 - three.5 0.9 - 1.3 0.6 - 0.8 0.4 -.
共0篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
共0篇回复 每页10篇 页次:1/1
我要回复
回复内容
验 证 码
看不清?更换一张
匿名发表 
关于我们
 
 
会员登录
登录账号:
登录密码:
验 证 码:
 
您好,您已登录
您有条新到站内短信
会员中心 退出登录
 
 
脚注信息
私慕纶特【官方网站】地址:北京怀柔  国家工信部备案号:京ICP备17017009号                         网站技术支持:汉中迅通网络  0916-2527669  13209164216